Superheroes don’t exist to protect status quo. We invented superheroes as champions for justice. Series like Watchmen or Marshal Law critique the superhero genre as a precursor to reactionary fascist ideals. Though nowadays we more often see them as coopting progressive ideas into liberalism. Look at real examples: Ultimates or Marvel Cinematic Universe are written from a liberal slant, while Punisher, Ripper, Frank Miller’s Batman, Frank Miller’s Holy Terror, Absolution or Alt Hero are often bordering on fascism. What a lot of people miss – it doesn’t have to be that way. Despite what some say, not every superhero is fascist. The concept of ‘guy with a secret identity and special abilities who fights for justice’ is very broad and can be used in many ways.
So I came up with the idea of ‘superfighter’ – a new kind of superhero. Genre needs to evolve or, eventually die. I’m not the first person to try to do this anyway, as ‘superfighters’ are inspired by certain existing heroes: Green Arrow; J M Straczynski’s and Gary Frank’s Nighthawk; or V, from V for Vendetta. Most of those, however, are outlaw vigilantes who use lethal force. Even Green Arrow eventually became this archetype in late 80s.
I think if we are to look for a blueprint for superfighters we need to look elsewhere. Where we actually need to look – is an obscure series by Gail Simone and Freddie Williams II. “The Movement” is a story of super-powered activists who form an anarchist superhero team that protects an autonomous territory in a large city. I think something like that could work as a new direction for the superhero genre.
HENCE:
MANIFESTO
- Superfighters need to fight for justice. All justice, including social justice and climate justice. Many legal actions are evil, many illegal actions are good – due to unjust laws. Superfighters need to recognize that. They should operate outside the law, or on the gray area of the border with the law. They should not be at the beck and call of the President and the Military. That would turn them into glorified supersoldiers or superspies. That would be propaganda. Superfighters should fight for the people – not for military industrial complex.
- That isn’t to say superheroes need to be illegal outlaws. They can be – if that’s the story you want to tell. But it makes as much sense that there is an equilibrium of peace between superfighters and the government. This is because no side actually wants a superhuman Civil War. And superfighters – who are superheroes – could have popular support. So as long as superfighters don’t rock the boat too much, they’re allowed to operate – sort of. (At its best, some Justice League comics show JL operating in such an equilibrium with the governments). This ‘uneasy peace’ allows for superfighters to exist without turning them into outlaws on the run, Unabomber style. It’d also allow for a more ‘traditional’ superhero universe. Similarly, superheroes with more ‘traditional’ views could have political disagreements with superfighters.
- Superfighters should have a strong moral compass. Saying that progressives are terrorists or serial killers is the narrative pushed by the ruling class. We can’t buy into that by making our heroes murderers. Look at Antifa: masked progressive vigilantes who manage to fight nazis and prefer to not use lethal force. We don’t read superhero books to read about superhuman terrorists. It is one thing to kill in self-defense, but assassination or murder solves nothing. We need to remove systems, not people.
- Superfighters need to recognize that police doesn’t exist to protect the people. It exists to protect private property of the ruling rich capitalist class. Some cooperation might be reasonable to allow criminals to be jailed, sure. But the fact is, superfighters should not be cops or be friendly with cops. Superfighter comics can’t be copaganda. There are no Commissioner Gordons in real life, and it’s absurd to think that a corrupt city like Gotham would have non-corrupt commissioners. In reality, good cops get fired – or worse. Police cannot be reformed, and superfighter stories need to reflect that.
- Of course, you might notice a contradiction. If superfighters are not meant to kill, how will they punish the villains who are not doing anything illegal? As such, superfighters need radical approach to community-driven and victim-driven justice. Let the community and victims decide what happens next in an impromptu court. Superfighters could act as arbiters to prevent it from turning into a lynch mob. Exile, property damage, forcing victim to repair the damage they wrought – under threat of force enforced by the superfighters… Just as we need to rethink our approach to justice and prisons, superfighter stories can be a tool to help start conversation on that.
If we abide by these principles, I believe we can create new kind of stories in the superhero genre. All genres need to evolve, or be left forgotten and obsolete, like Western did. There is nothing inherently wrong with setting story in 19th century American Frontier. But the genre became so steeped in its conventions and tropes – often racist and misogynist – that it slowly died. Superhero genre will go the way of the western if we don’t adapt and don’t listen to criticism.


